click to show more information

click to hide/show information About your Search

20130318
20130326
Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1
, when we writing the traditional -- transitional administrative law and later on when the peace was negotiated, there was an assumption that the players were going to abide by the rules. this assumption was wrong. some had no intention of abiding. asy went along, but as soon they got into power, they started flouting the rules, blatantly. i mean, explicitly, it is stated in the constitution of certain institutions are independent, like the central bank. the law made clear that it was independent of the government. i was the head of the media committee, and restructured a media commission that was intended to be independent. all of these have been reined in and the auspices and the control of the prime minister have done it on the basis of, well, these all have some executive functions and therefore they should be part of it. they are abusing the semantic definition. oft really means a kind hijacking of the power of all these institutions, which are the guardians of the democratic system. once these have gone, what do we have for this democracy? the americans should make it clear
Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1